Skip to main content
University of Washington Health Sciences Library

Identifying Reputable Journals

Suggestions for avoiding disreputable or predatory journals and identifying reputable journals

Identifying Reputable Journals

With the proliferation of journal titles and frequent email solicitations for manuscripts, it can be challenging for authors to determine whether a journal is reputable.

Many tools exist for identifying suitable journals where you can submit your manuscript.  See, for example, the HSL Writer's Guide.

Ways to identify reputable journals include:

  1. Avoid journals with traits identified by Shamsheer et al. (BMC Medicine 2017) or described by the World Association of Medical Editors.
  2. Review the Think.Check.Submit. checklist for ways to identify trusted journals.    
  3. See if the publisher is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) or if they follow the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations.
  4. For open access journals, check the Directory of Open Access Journals.    
  5. Contact a librarian for assistance.

Predatory or Disreputable Journals

Predatory or disreputable journals can be defined as journals that "do not follow best publication practices."  For example:

  • Peer review may be poor or non-existent.
  • Editorial board membership information may be inaccurate.
  • Information about publishing costs or article processing charges may be misleading.
  • Journals might not be indexed in databases such as PubMed, PsycInfo, or CINAHL.
  • Content might not be digitally preserved.
Health Sciences Library | 1959 NE Pacific Street, T334 Health Sciences Building, Box 357155, Seattle, WA 98195-7155 USA, 206-543-3390 | Privacy | Terms