"Sham sites that are designed to look like real news outlets. They may include misleading photographs and headlines that, at first read, sound like they could be real." 1
"Content that is 100% false, designed to deceive and do harm."3
"Viral deception" and "identity theft"4
ASK YOURSELF:
Does the url end with .co or .su?
Does the site look unprofessional -- poorly written and designed?
Are there any mainstream news outlets covering this story?
Has the story been debunked by Snopes and other watchdog groups?
"Practical guide for the student fact-checker. It supplements generic information literacy with the specific web-based techniques that can get you closer to the truth on the web more quickly."
Term coined by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Director of the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg Public Policy Center, on CNN's Reliable Sources, 5 Mar. 2017.
HIGHLY PARTISAN
DEFINITION:
"A type of misleading news, this may be an interpretation of a real news event where the facts are manipulated to fit an agenda.."1
ASK YOURSELF:
Is there an "About Us" statement? Does this provide clues to potential bias?
Does the article combine news with opinion?
Where on the left to right political continuum does the source fall? To find out use Media Bias/Fact Check.
Does the story convey bias? Check AllSides to see how the same story is written with different biases.
Check your confirmation bias. Are you more likely to believe the story because it aligns with your political beliefs?
"The shocking or teasing headlines of these stories trick you into clicking for more information" for the purpose to increasing online advertising revenue via social media sharing.1
ASK YOURSELF:
Does this have a sensational and provocative headline?
Does the site look unprofessional -- poorly written and designed?