Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
University of Washington Health Sciences Library

Systematic Reviews and other evidence synthesis projects

To Do during this step

  • Prepare your data for synthesis
  • Determine the heterogeneity of your data (for quantitative data)
  • Determine whether changes to your protocol plan are necessary, documenting any made
  • Synthesize your data

About Synthesizing

"Synthesis is a process of bringing together data from a set of included studies with the aim of drawing conclusions about a body of evidence. This will include synthesis of study characteristics and, potentially, statistical synthesis of study findings." - McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, Ryan RE, Thomson HJ, Johnston RV. Chapter 9: Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from

In this step, you will analyze and synthesize the data extracted from the included studies to address your systematic review question. How you do this depends on the type of studies relevant to your research question. You will have planned this during your protocol and it has guided your data extraction decisions; now you can work on the data itself.

The Cochrane Handbook Chapter 9 lays out a series of steps, paraphrased briefly here:

  1. Describe each study including their interventions
  2. Determine which are similar enough to be grouped
  3. Determine what data from them are available for synthesis, converting their format if necessary
  4. Determine whether any modification to the planned comparisons or outcomes is needed, making note of any deviations from your  protocol plans
  5. Perform synthesis

Reading the full chapter is highly recommended. This page is only a brief outline of the process to help with your planning. The Cochrane chapter goes into extensive detail about how to actually conduct the synthesis. Alternately, you can read the section of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis that corresponds to your review type.

About Meta-analysis

A meta-analysis is only relevant for reviews of study types that produce quantitative data, including mixed-method reviews that use a convergent segregated approach to synthesis and integration.

If this applies to your review, your team will need to have someone experienced with biostatistics. This might be someone who has been involved in all the steps of the review, or someone joining the team just for this step.

To determine whether a meta-analysis is appropriate, it is necessary to first calculate the heterogeneity-- the presence and extent of between-study variation--which affects the extent to which generalizable conclusions can be formed. If heterogeneity is present, your team will need to decide on how to take it into account.

Instructions for performing a meta-analysis are beyond the scope of this guide. Refer instead to Chapter 10 and Chapter 11 in the Cochrane Handbook or the section in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis that corresponds to your review type, or one of the resources below.

Qualitative Data

A meta-analysis cannot be performed on qualitative data: a different analysis method must be used. Below are methods for analyzing qualitative data for systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis types.

All Evidence Synthesis Types

Systematic Reviews

Rapid Reviews


From University of Toronto Gerstein Science Information Centre

Health Sciences Library | 1959 NE Pacific Street, T334 Health Sciences Building, Box 357155, Seattle, WA 98195-7155 USA, 206-543-3390 | Privacy | Terms
CC BY-NC 4.0 Text on this page created by UW Libraries is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Images and video are not included. See details.